Barcelona Clinches Win After Controversial Penalty Decision
barcelona defeated Rayo Vallecano 1-0 on Monday, thanks to a penalty converted by Robert Lewandowski. The goal, however, stemmed from a contentious decision, initially missed by the on-field referee but awarded after a VAR review.
Newly released audio from the VAR match officials provides insight into the rationale behind the controversial penalty call.
VAR referee Díaz de Mera prompted on-field referee Mario Melero López for an on-field review (OFR), stating, “Mario, I recommend an OFR so that you can evaluate a possible penalty.” Melero López, wanting to review the incident, responded, “Perfect, I’ll see it.Show me the image so I can see the grab. It was Pathé Ciss, wasn’t it?”
The VAR confirmed it was Ciss who committed the foul. After reviewing the incident, Melero López ruled in favor of a penalty, stating, “He’s ignoring the ball. He’s clearly ignoring it. the ball is not in the area but it’s clear. With his left hand he’s holding him by the stomach.He’s not looking at the ball and he’s completely forgetting about the ball. I’m going to signal a penalty and a yellow card.”
Lewandowski successfully converted the resulting penalty, securing his 20th goal in La Liga this season.
How did the audio from the VAR match officials contribute to understanding the rationale behind the controversial penalty call?
Barcelona Clinches Win After Controversial Penalty Decision
barcelona defeated Rayo Vallecano 1-0 on Monday,thanks to a penalty converted by Robert Lewandowski.the goal, however, stemmed from a contentious decision, initially missed by the on-field referee but awarded after a VAR review.
Newly released audio from the VAR match officials provides insight into the rationale behind the controversial penalty call.
VAR referee Díaz de Mera prompted on-field referee Mario Melero López for an on-field review (OFR), stating, “Mario, I recommend an OFR so that you can evaluate a possible penalty.” Melero López,wanting to review the incident,responded,“Perfect, I’ll see it.Show me the image so I can see the grab.It was Pathé Ciss, wasn’t it?”
The VAR confirmed it was Ciss who committed the foul. after reviewing the incident, Melero López ruled in favor of a penalty, stating, “He’s ignoring the ball. He’s clearly ignoring it. the ball is not in the area but it’s clear. With his left hand he’s holding him by the stomach.He’s not looking at the ball and he’s wholly forgetting about the ball. I’m going to signal a penalty and a yellow card.”
Lewandowski successfully converted the resulting penalty, securing his 20th goal in La Liga this season..
Frequently Asked Questions:
*Why was the penalty awarded?**
The VAR determined that Rayo Vallecano’s Pathé Ciss committed a foul by grabbing Barcelona’s player in the stomach, ignoring the ball in the process.
* **Did the referee initially see the foul?** No,the on-field referee missed the foul initially but reviewed the incident after a recommendation from the VAR.
* **What evidence did the VAR use to make the decision?** Released audio reveals that the VAR showed the on-field referee replays of the incident, highlighting Ciss’s grip on the Barcelona player.
* **What were the consequences for Ciss?** Ciss received a yellow card for the foul.
This controversial penalty decision highlights the ever-evolving role of VAR in football, demonstrating its ability to correct on-field errors while also sparking debate about its impact on the flow and fairness of the game.
