Jason Kelce clarifies Stance on “Tush Push” Amidst NFL Ban Debate
Former Philadelphia Eagles center jason Kelce is pushing back against assertions that his comments support banning the controversial “tush push” play, despite acknowledging its grueling nature.
Kelce Disputes Claims His Words Justify Ban
Amid ongoing discussions among NFL teams regarding the future of the ”tush push,” Kelce took to social media to address reports that his previous statements were being used to advocate for its prohibition. Specifically,he refuted claims that his retirement was directly linked to the wear and tear from performing the play.
“Grueling,Not Dangerous”: Kelce’s Position on the Play
Kelce clarified that while he has described the “tush push” as “grueling” and even admitted to exclaiming colorful phrases during its execution,he has never deemed it dangerous.He emphasized the physical exertion involved but downplayed the risk of serious injury.
“I think the good gentleman from Buffalo appears to have misunderstood my meaning of the word grueling, I have never called the play dangerous,” Kelce posted online.
NFL Teams Debate Future of Controversial Play
The debate surrounding the “tush push,” also known as the “brotherly shove,” continues within the NFL. Green Bay Packers president Mark Murphy, who proposed a rule to ban the play that was recently tabled, referenced Kelce’s past comments as justification.Kelce insists his remarks have been misinterpreted, stating on his podcast that while the play is physically taxing, it doesn’t considerably increase the risk of injury.
“The play sucks to run, but it sucks because of exertion. It’s not going to be a play, from my personal perspective, where you’re going to see this huge increase and chance of risk of injury,” Kelce said.
Kelce Offers Testimony if NFL Seeks Input
Kelce has offered to provide his expertise to the NFL should they seek further input on the matter. His firsthand experience as a center executing the play positions him as a educated voice in the ongoing discussion.
“If the NFL wishes to summon me for legitimate thoughts on the tush push under oath, I’d be glad to give my testimony,” Kelce wrote.
Why did Mark Murphy of the Green bay Packers reference jason Kelce’s comments when proposing a ban on the “tush push”?
Jason Kelce Clarifies Stance on “Tush Push” Amidst NFL Ban Debate
Former Philadelphia Eagles center Jason kelce is pushing back against assertions that his comments support banning the controversial “tush push” play, despite acknowledging its grueling nature.
Kelce Disputes Claims His Words Justify Ban
Amid ongoing discussions among NFL teams regarding the future of the “tush push,” Kelce took to social media to address reports that his previous statements were being used to advocate for its prohibition. Specifically, he refuted claims that his retirement was directly linked to the wear and tear from performing the play.
“Grueling, Not perilous”: Kelce’s Position on the Play
Kelce clarified that while he has described the “tush push” as “grueling” and even admitted to exclaiming colorful phrases during its execution, he has never deemed it dangerous. He emphasized the physical exertion involved but downplayed the risk of serious injury.
“I think the good gentleman from Buffalo appears to have misunderstood my meaning of the word grueling, I have never called the play dangerous,” Kelce posted online.
NFL Teams Debate future of Controversial Play
The debate surrounding the “tush push,” also known as the “brotherly shove,” continues within the NFL. Green Bay Packers president Mark Murphy, who proposed a rule to ban the play that was recently tabled, referenced Kelce’s past comments as justification.Kelce insists his remarks have been misinterpreted, stating on his podcast that while the play is physically taxing, it doesn’t considerably increase the risk of injury.
“the play sucks to run, but it sucks because of exertion. It’s not going to be a play, from my personal outlook, where you’re going to see this huge increase and chance of risk of injury,” Kelce said.
Kelce Offers Testimony if NFL Seeks Input
Kelce has offered to provide his expertise to the NFL should they seek further input on the matter. His firsthand experience as a center executing the play positions him as an educated voice in the ongoing discussion.
“If the NFL wishes to summon me for legitimate thoughts on the tush push under oath,I’d be glad to give my testimony,” Kelce wrote.
Frequently Asked Questions about the “Tush Push”
- What exactly is the “tush push” play?
- It’s a short-yardage play where the quarterback lines up directly behind the center, and several teammates push from behind to propel the ball forward. It’s often used in situations where a team needs a yard or less for a first down or touchdown.
- Why is the “tush push” controversial?
- Some critics argue it’s not exciting to watch and gives an unfair advantage, while some are concerned about potential injury risks, even though Kelce refutes this.
- What makes the play “grueling” according to Kelce?
- Kelce emphasizes the intense physical exertion required, including the strain on the offensive line to create push, and the body control needed by the quarterback.
- What’s the “brotherly shove” and how does it relate to the “tush push?”
- The “brotherly shove” is just another name for the tush push, a nickname earned by the Philadelphia Eagles for their accomplished use of it.
- Is the play safe? What does Kelce say about it?
- Kelce believes the play is not especially dangerous, despite its physicality.He emphasizes the exertion but downplays the risk of serious injury.
- What is the NFL doing with the play?
- The NFL is currently debating whether to ban or modify the play. Discussions are ongoing,and the league is considering the perspectives of players and team executives.
Jason Kelce’s willingness to testify underscores the importance of expert viewpoints in shaping the future of the “tush push.”