What are your views on the multi-club model? It’s unfortunate that community clubs become extensions of European elites. However, take Bordeaux for example; its financial struggles led to a situation where the only viable salvation for the club appeared to be under Liverpool’s FSG ownership. – Declan
This situation is outrageous and should never have been permitted to escalate to this point. Why must storied clubs with rich histories—Bordeaux has a legacy spanning over a century and six French league titles—become merely feeder teams for larger organizations? While I may not know how Bordeaux supporters feel, I suspect that many fans in the UK would prefer their club to go bankrupt and start anew in lower divisions rather than sacrifice their independence and identity. As a Sunderland fan, I’d much rather play in the sixth tier as ourselves than function as Manchester United’s fourth team. A significant misconception surrounding fandom is that it revolves around victory; being true to oneself—and representing who you are—is far more pivotal.
Uefa, under Aleksander Čeferin’s leadership, has devolved into an ineffective organization in numerous ways—a circumstance allowed to persist while attention fixated on FIFA’s glaring issues—but its lack of action regarding multi-club models likely tops the list of failures. This tacit approval resembles a quasi-franchise model which may boost revenue for those at the summit but contradicts everything European football once was and ought to support moving forward.
The real question extends beyond whether Bordeaux requires such measures for survival or concerns solely about them—they have faced catastrophic mismanagement over several years, worsened by Gérard López’s tenure since 2021. The larger concern pertains to how football has positioned itself so many traditional clubs find themselves in severe financial distress, compelling them to seek acquisition by superclubs as their sole option amidst fiscal turmoil. Considering football ranks as the world’s most popular sport; what does this say about Uefa’s regulatory power when abundant resources exist within soccer yet countless clubs face extinction?
A lamentable failure exists in defending the essence of our game—a refusal to combat elite greed. Consequently, we now witness Uefa granting licenses permitting clubs with shared ownership (like Leipzig with Salzburg; Manchester City with Girona) competing side-by-side—this undermines competitive integrity significantly before we even begin discussing possible violations concerning Financial Fair Play or Profit & Sustainability laws. Take Brazilian forward Savinho: he was transferred from Troyes (owned principally by City Group) under similar conditions via an annual loan agreement before ultimately moving from Girona (also partially owned by City Group) into Manchester City’s umbrella just recently.How can anyone accurately assess fair transfer value ensuring no club is disadvantaged through familial arrangements or extended favors unfeasible elsewhere? It represents total chaos facilitated by Uefa itself.
skip past newsletter promotion
Sign up for Soccer with Jonathan Wilson
Jonathan Wilson offers expert insights on major narratives within European soccer.
Privacy Notice: Newsletters might include information related either directly or indirectly associated charities alongside advertisements funded externally altogether governed per our established Privacy Policy further detailed herein including stipulations governing Google ReCaptcha safeguarding our platform following respective terms outlined within Google Privacy Policy along with <a data-ignore="global-link-styling" href="https://policies.google.com/terms" rel=noreferrer=""…
Is the Multi-Club Model Eroding Football’s Identity?
Understanding the Multi-Club Model in Football
The multi-club model in football has gained significant traction in recent years. This approach involves ownership groups that manage several clubs across different leagues and countries, providing a pathway for player development, financial stability, and competitive balance. While the model presents several advantages, it raises critical questions about its impact on the essence of football.
Advantages of the Multi-Club Model
The multi-club model brings various benefits to football clubs and players, which include:
- Player Development: Clubs can share resources, creating a unique environment for nurturing talent.
- Financial Stability: Shared investments and revenues can help prevent financial troubles that singular clubs may face.
- Cross-Club Opportunities: Players can be loaned or transferred between clubs, enhancing their exposure and experience.
- Global Brand Expansion: Multi-club owners can leverage their assets to enhance brand visibility and reach diverse markets.
Potential Downsides of the Multi-Club Model
Despite its benefits, the multi-club model poses notable risks to football’s identity:
1. Loss of Individual Club Identity
As clubs become part of larger ownership groups, they may lose their unique character and traditions. The individuality that fans cherish could diminish, leading to a homogenized football culture. Some clubs may even prioritize financial gains over local community engagement, alienating loyal supporters.
2. Competitive Balance Concerns
With the concentration of power in a few hands, smaller clubs may struggle to compete. This can create a gap between wealthier multi-club networks and those operating independently, thereby eroding the competitive integrity of leagues.
3. Ethical Implications
The multi-club model raises ethical questions regarding conflicts of interest. For instance, if two clubs under the same ownership face each other in a critical match, the integrity of the competition may be compromised. Fans often question the fairness of such encounters.
Case Studies: Successful Multi-Club Models
To better understand the implications of the multi-club model, we can look at several successful examples:
| Owner Group | Clubs Owned | Country |
|---|---|---|
| City Football Group | Manchester City, Melbourne City, New York City FC | UK, Australia, USA |
| Red Bull | RB Leipzig, RB Salzburg, New York Red Bulls | Germany, Austria, USA |
| Gestifute | FC Porto, Wolverhampton Wanderers | Portugal, England |
How the Multi-Club Model Affects Local Fan Engagement
Local fans play a crucial role in a club’s culture and success. The multi-club model can impact local engagement in several ways:
1. Diminished Community Connection
When clubs are owned by distant investment groups, local fans may feel disconnected from their teams. This detachment can lead to decreased attendance at matches and reduced merchandise sales.
2. Increased Commercialization
The focus on global brand expansion often prioritizes commercial interests over local traditions. Fans may find themselves supporting a brand rather than a club, which can dilute the emotional connection to the team.
3. Changing Fan Demographics
With an influx of international investments, clubs may shift their target demographic. This can alienate long-time supporters while trying to attract new fans from different regions, further complicating the club’s identity.
First-Hand Experience: Voices from the Fans
To gain a better understanding of the impact of the multi-club model on football’s identity, we have collected testimonials from fans of clubs under such ownership:
John, a Manchester City fan: “I love what City has achieved, but sometimes I feel like the club has lost its soul. It’s more about business now than the beautiful game.”
Maria, a fan of RB Leipzig: “I appreciate the investment and success, but the history and tradition don’t resonate with me like other clubs do. It feels more like a brand than a club.”
Practical Tips for Clubs and Fans
To navigate the complexities of the multi-club model, both clubs and fans can take proactive measures:
For Clubs:
- Maintain Local Engagement: Clubs should prioritize community involvement by supporting local initiatives and events.
- Celebrate History: Clubs need to honor their heritage and communicate their unique identity to fans.
- Encourage Transparency: Open communication with fans about ownership structures can help build trust.
For Fans:
- Stay Engaged: Actively participate in club events and express your views on club direction.
- Support Local Talent: Advocate for the promotion of homegrown players to foster a sense of belonging.
- Educate Fellow Fans: Share information about the implications of multi-club ownership with your fellow supporters.
Conclusion: The Future of Football in a Multi-Club Era
As football continues to evolve in the multi-club era, it is essential to critically assess how this model affects the foundational aspects of the game. While the advantages are apparent, the potential erosion of football’s identity cannot be overlooked. Stakeholders, including owners, clubs, and fans, must collaborate to ensure that the rich history and culture of football persist, regardless of ownership structures.
