Franco Ordine, a journalist, asserts that AC Milan’s most significant error during the summer was not the decision to retain certain players but rather the appointment of Paulo Fonseca as head coach.
Following their triumph in the Derby della Madonnina against Inter, it seemed like Milan was on an upward trajectory. Fonseca had introduced a fresh system that appeared effective, instilling confidence as the team approached the upcoming international break.
However, this optimism quickly gave way to disappointment as the Rossoneri fell 1-0 to Bayer Leverkusen and subsequently lost 2-1 to Fiorentina. Consequently, they have only managed three victories out of nine matches under Fonseca across all competitions. These results, combined with the players’ on-field performances, have led to speculation about the coach’s precarious position.
In his weekly column for MilanNews, Ordine did not hold back in expressing his views on the leadership’s choice to hire Fonseca over a more seasoned coach.
“It is undeniable that the current iteration of Milan has made numerous serious blunders. For instance, in the transfer market: the sale of Kalulu (a grave misstep) resolved an issue for Juve, and then there’s Adli’s departure, which left the midfield severely weakened by Bennacer’s injury.
“The absence of a substitute for Hernandez (Jimenez, initially supported by Ibra but then sidelined due to injury, and Bartesaghi engaged with Milan Futuro), along with Daniel Maldini being loaned to Monza, are just a few points raised by critics who tend to overlook past mistakes made by the management that brought players like Mandzukic, Castillejo, Dest, Origi, and others to Milanello — a list that could be extensive.
“However, the most significant mistake remains the selection of coach Fonseca, whose arrival at Milanello was met with widespread skepticism. This atmosphere seeped into the Rossoneri enclosure, negatively impacting the team, despite the absence of Ibra and Moncada’s efforts to counteract it.
“Currently, Fonseca’s position is not under scrutiny (though it should be noted that he will not be defended unconditionally, as was the case with Boban and Maldini when Giampaolo was dismissed after just seven matches).
“Ironically, those defending Fonseca might be motivated by the concern that a potential firing could lead to the appointment of another coach of similar caliber, such as Juric at Roma. Sarri is not favored, as his style of play requires extensive adaptation. The only candidate who seems fitting for the role might be Max Allegri.”
AC Milan’s Coaching Conundrum: The Mistake of Choosing Paulo Fonseca
Understanding the Context of AC Milan’s Coaching Search
AC Milan is one of the most storied clubs in football history, with a rich legacy that includes multiple Serie A championships and European trophies. However, recent seasons have seen the Rossoneri struggle for consistency, prompting a search for a new head coach to steer the club back to glory. Among the candidates discussed, Paulo Fonseca’s name has emerged, leading to significant debate about whether he is the right choice for the club.
Who is Paulo Fonseca?
Paulo Fonseca is a Portuguese football manager known for his tactical acumen and attacking style of play. He gained prominence through his successful stints at clubs like Paços de Ferreira, Braga, and Porto, and has also managed in top leagues, including Serie A with AS Roma. His coaching philosophy emphasizes possession-based football, which could initially seem appealing to AC Milan’s traditional playing style.
Coaching Philosophy
- Focus on attacking football
- Strong emphasis on possession and pressing
- Willingness to promote youth players
The Argument Against Fonseca
While Fonseca possesses certain attractive qualities, several arguments suggest that choosing him as AC Milan’s next head coach may be a mistake.
1. Lack of Major Trophy Experience
One of the most significant drawbacks of Fonseca’s coaching resume is his lack of experience in winning major trophies. While he has had success in domestic leagues, he has not yet led a team to significant silverware in Europe. This raises concerns about his ability to perform under the pressures of managing a club like AC Milan, where expectations are sky-high.
2. Inconsistency at Previous Clubs
Fonseca’s tenure at AS Roma highlighted some of his limitations. Despite showing promise, he struggled to maintain consistent performances, leading to his dismissal. In the cutthroat environment of Serie A, where AC Milan must compete against clubs with strong infrastructures, inconsistency could be detrimental.
3. Tactical Limitations
Although Fonseca has a clear vision of how he wants his teams to play, his tactical approach can be rigid. Clubs like AC Milan often require a coach who can adapt strategies based on the opponent and match situation. Fonseca’s tendency to stick to a specific formation can lead to predictable gameplay, making it easier for opponents to exploit weaknesses.
4. Previous Relationships with Players
Player-manager relationships are crucial for a successful tenure. During his time at AS Roma, reports suggested that some players were dissatisfied with his methods, which can lead to a toxic locker room environment. At AC Milan, where team spirit is vital, this could pose significant challenges.
Alternative Coaching Candidates for AC Milan
As AC Milan navigates its coaching conundrum, several alternative candidates could provide a better fit. Consider the following options:
Antonio Conte
- Proven track record of success in Italy and Europe.
- Strong tactical acumen with a focus on winning immediately.
- Experience managing top-tier clubs, fostering an environment of discipline and high performance.
Maurizio Sarri
- Known for his unique playing style, often termed “Sarriball.”
- Experience winning Serie A with Juventus and bringing teams to the latter stages of European competitions.
- Ability to develop young talents while also utilizing experienced players effectively.
Mark van Bommel
- Former player with deep ties to the club and understanding of its culture.
- Experience in managing at the highest levels, including European competitions.
- Potential to bring fresh ideas while respecting AC Milan’s traditions.
Player Impact Considerations
The choice of head coach can significantly affect player morale and performance. Here are key aspects to consider:
- Player Development: Coaches with a track record of developing young talent can reinvigorate a squad, making them more competitive in Serie A.
- Player Retention: A respected coach can help retain top players who might otherwise seek opportunities elsewhere if they lack faith in the club’s direction.
- Team Cohesion: A coach who fosters a positive locker room environment can lead to improved on-pitch chemistry, vital for success.
Benefits of Choosing a Proven Winner
Opting for a coach like Antonio Conte or Maurizio Sarri could yield several benefits:
1. Immediate Results
Coaches with winning backgrounds often instill a winning mentality, leading to immediate improvements in results.
2. Tactical Versatility
Experienced coaches come equipped with a variety of tactical setups, allowing them to adapt to different situations and opponents.
3. Enhanced Recruitment
Top coaches can attract high-caliber players who wish to play under a respected manager, significantly boosting the team’s quality.
Case Studies of Successful Coaching Changes
Analyzing successful coaching changes at top clubs can provide insights into how AC Milan might proceed. Here are a couple of examples:
Leicester City – Claudio Ranieri
When Leicester City hired Claudio Ranieri, they were seen as underdogs. His leadership and tactical approach led them to an unprecedented Premier League title, showcasing how the right manager can elevate a team profoundly.
Manchester City – Pep Guardiola
Guardiola transformed Manchester City with his innovative tactics and high expectations. His tenure has brought multiple trophies and established City as a European powerhouse, emphasizing the impact of a coach with a proven track record.
Conclusion
While Paulo Fonseca brings certain attractive qualities to the table, the potential risks associated with his appointment may outweigh the benefits. AC Milan must carefully consider the direction they wish to take and the type of coach that aligns with their ambitions. The club’s future depends significantly on the decision they make in this crucial period.
