UEFA Backs Controversial VAR Call in Real Madrid-Atletico Madrid Champions League Clash
UEFA has officially supported the Video Assistant RefereeS (VAR) decision to disallow a penalty scored by Atletico Madrid’s Julian Alvarez against Real Madrid in the Champions League Round of 16, a decision that ignited widespread debate among fans and pundits.
The controversial moment occurred during the penalty shootout following Atletico’s 1-0 victory, which leveled the aggregate score. Alvarez successfully converted his penalty, but it was overturned after VAR resolute he struck the ball twice during his attempt, a violation of the rules.
Outcry Over Disallowed Goal
Atletico Madrid fans and observers questioned the ruling, with many arguing that available camera angles did not definitively prove the double touch. A newly surfaced angle further fueled the controversy, casting doubt on the accuracy of the VAR’s judgment.
UEFA Defends VAR Decision
Despite the uproar, UEFA maintains that the VAR officials acted correctly. According to Miguel Delaney, UEFA confirmed that the VAR’s decision was based solely on the visual evidence of the double touch, without relying on additional sensors or technology.
Mbappé’s Initial Observation and Lingering Doubts
Adding another layer to the controversy, it was reported that Kylian Mbappé was the first to point out the potential infraction to the referee. Thierry Henry has also publicly expressed reservations about the call, sparking discussions about why the penalty wasn’t retaken instead of being nullified.
The match concluded with Real Madrid defeating Atletico Madrid 4-2 on penalties, advancing to the next round of the Champions League.
what specific visual evidence led the VAR officials to determine that Julian Alvarez made a double touch during his penalty kick?
UEFA Backs Controversial VAR Call in Real Madrid-Atletico Madrid Champions League Clash
UEFA has officially supported the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) decision to disallow a penalty scored by Atletico Madrid’s Julian Alvarez against Real Madrid in the Champions League Round of 16,a decision that ignited widespread debate among fans and pundits.
The controversial moment occurred during the penalty shootout following Atletico’s 1-0 victory, which leveled the aggregate score. Alvarez successfully converted his penalty, but it was overturned after VAR persistent he struck the ball twice during his attempt, a violation of the rules.
Outcry Over Disallowed Goal
Atletico Madrid fans and observers questioned the ruling, with many arguing that available camera angles did not definitively prove the double touch. A newly surfaced angle further fueled the controversy, casting doubt on the accuracy of the VAR’s judgment.
UEFA Defends VAR Decision
Despite the uproar, UEFA maintains that the VAR officials acted correctly. According to Miguel Delaney, UEFA confirmed that the VAR’s decision was based solely on the visual evidence of the double touch, without relying on additional sensors or technology.
Mbappé’s Initial Observation and Lingering Doubts
Adding another layer to the controversy, it was reported that Kylian Mbappé was the first to point out the potential infraction to the referee. thierry Henry has also publicly expressed reservations about the call, sparking discussions about why the penalty wasn’t retaken instead of being nullified.
The match concluded with Real Madrid defeating Atletico Madrid 4-2 on penalties, advancing to the next round of the Champions League.
Q&A: Unpacking the VAR Controversy
Why was Julian Alvarez’s penalty disallowed?
The penalty was disallowed as VAR determined Alvarez made a double touch while kicking the ball. This is against the rules of football, even during a penalty shootout. A double touch occurs when the kicker touches the ball twice in a row without it being touched by another player.
What’s the rule about double touches in penalties?
According to the IFAB (International Football Association Board), if a player touches the ball twice in a row, the kick is considered illegal. The opposing team is awarded an indirect free kick from the spot where the second touch occurred.
Why was there so much controversy surrounding the VAR decision?
The controversy stemmed from several factors: skepticism about the camera angles’ ability to definitively prove a double touch, the high stakes of the match (a Champions League knockout game), and the subjective nature of the VAR review itself.Some fans and pundits felt the evidence wasn’t clear enough to overturn the original decision.
Why wasn’t the penalty retaken rather of being disallowed?
The rules state that a double touch results in an indirect free kick for the defending team, not a retake. The penalty is effectively “nullified.”
Did Kylian Mbappé realy influence the call?
Reports indicate that Mbappé, a fellow professional, may have noticed the potential infraction and alerted the referee. this added another layer of intrigue to the situation. the specific influence is not explicitly stated, but the implication is that his observation played a part.
How common are double touches in penalties?
Double touches are relatively rare in penalties, as players are typically focused on generating power and accuracy. However, they are not unheard of, and VAR has made them more visible. Fun Fact: The most common penalty mistake is shooting wide or over the bar!
What does UEFA’s backing of the VAR decision mean?
UEFA’s support indicates that they beleive the VAR officials made the correct judgment based on the available evidence and the rules of the game. This stance is meant to reinforce their confidence in the VAR system, even when controversial calls are made.
The VAR decision remains a talking point.Understanding the rules and context helps to clarify the situation, even if it doesn’t resolve the debate. For more insights on football rules and VAR, be sure to follow the latest developments!
