For the second consecutive year, The Athletic reported on the NHL player media tours, which took place last month in Prague and last week in Las Vegas, partly to conduct a preseason player survey.
Approximately three dozen players in attendance participated in the survey to gauge the overall sentiment within the league on topics including long-term injured reserve, tax advantages, the league’s top captain, and the prospects of Atlanta or Arizona receiving another NHL franchise.
The answers from players were anonymous to encourage candid opinions, although some players opted to share their views publicly.
Here are their insights. Enjoy!
This topic has sparked considerable debate among fans and media alike, especially since four of the last five Stanley Cup champions and seven of the last ten finalists hailed from states that do not impose state income taxes.
In a recent survey conducted by The Athletic, 84.6 percent of 14,066 fans believed that teams located in no-state-income-tax regions hold a competitive edge. Among them, 42.8 percent felt that measures should be taken to level the playing field, while 41.5 percent argued that the advantage is not significant enough to necessitate major changes.
Both the NHL and NHLPA have indicated that they are keeping an eye on the situation, acknowledging that addressing it would be complicated, though currently, it doesn’t seem to be a pressing concern. NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly remarked last week, “If we have the next 10 years similar to the last five, then maybe it’s something that needs to be addressed.”
GO DEEPER
NHL monitoring teams’ income-tax advantages, but ‘there are no easy fixes’
So what are the players’ perspectives?
<p“One player from a Canadian team remarked, “It is indeed an advantage. If you earn $6 million in New York City versus $6 million in Florida, that makes a difference. Yet, there was a time when everyone wanted to play in Chicago, which isn’t exactly a favorable tax location. The same goes for Pittsburgh.”
In essence, various factors influence a player’s desire to join any city in the NHL—not solely taxes.
<p“Consider past Stanley Cup winners: Pittsburgh, Washington, Detroit,” said another player. “Therefore, I don’t see it as a significant advantage. Everything tends to balance out. Plus, what happens if you get traded? This isn't a concern in other leagues. The NHLPA stated there’s literally nothing they can do about it at this point.”
A young player from the Eastern Conference added, “No one complained when these teams were struggling, like Florida and Tampa did a decade ago. Now that they are performing well, suddenly there’s outrage.”
The consensus among players is that finding a solution would be challenging for the league.
<p“There’s no straightforward fix,” said an Eastern Conference player. “It’s a complicated issue involving many factors. For me, I just focus on playing hockey.”
<pAs one superstar humorously stated, “I prefer to avoid politics.”
This brings us to the Mark Stone/Nikita Kucherov scenario.
Kucherov notably made a comeback from long-term injured reserve for the Tampa Bay Lightning’s Game 1 of the 2021 playoffs, where he scored 32 points in 23 games and celebrated the Stanley Cup victory with an “$18 million over the cap” T-shirt. This gesture upset many, including officials in the league office.
There are two reasons to anticipate alterations to this rule (or loophole) as we approach the 2026-27 CBA negotiations.
First, Daly recently mentioned that the “majority” of the 32 GMs in the league seek a modification. This development is significant. For a considerable time, GMs overlooked the matter, likely because they wanted a safety net for potential cap and injury challenges as the trade deadline approached.
GO DEEPER
NHL expansion, LTIR, Russians in the Olympics and renaming the Lady Byng: Bill Daly talks
However, perhaps the most compelling reason to expect a change is the players’ desire for one. In collective bargaining discussions, this plays a significant role.
“That’s a simpler fix than the (no-state income tax) issue,” remarked one player.
It’s worth noting that players do not believe the Vegas Golden Knights are fabricating Stone’s injuries. After a back surgery two years prior and a spleen laceration last season, the timing of his recovery has enabled Vegas to make strategic adjustments ahead of the trade deadline. Stone returned in time for the playoffs, including the moment when the team clinched the Stanley Cup.
“It’s astounding how players can become medically cleared just in time for Game 1. Suddenly, you’re facing a team that’s $40 million over the cap,” stated another player.
Another player humorously added, “If they want to prevent Vegas from winning again, they should really consider changing it. I don’t think anyone is faking injuries. Ultimately, all teams have the same options, but some execute them more effectively than others.”
The majority of players are in favor of an adjustment.
“I doubt that Vegas intends to keep doing this indefinitely,” said one player. “But if they were to make a change, it would eliminate any complaints.”
Another chimed in, “Vegas operates in their own way each year, which can be complicated, but there definitely needs to be a solution.”
Conversely, some players do not find it as troubling.
“If the owners are willing to open their wallets, then there’s a loophole in the rules,” one player pointed out.
The NHL will take a hiatus from February 12 to 20 for the 4 Nations Face-Off.
But why four?
There are two main reasons: Firstly, the NHL aims to remain in alignment with the International Olympic Committee’s decisions regarding restrictions on Russia.
due to its invasion of Ukraine, the NHL will not include Russian players in the upcoming 2024 Summer Games in Paris, and likely not in the 2026 Winter Games in Milan either.
Another factor is that the league prefers participation solely from NHL players. Countries with smaller hockey programs, including Czechia, Switzerland, Slovakia, and Germany, struggle to assemble complete rosters.
Most NHL players comprehend this situation, even if some feel disappointed about not being able to compete.
“Certainly, I plan to enjoy the 11-day break,” quipped Germany’s Leon Draisaitl, fully aware his response would be noted. “While I will take it, I’d still prefer to participate. However, I recognize the rationale behind this decision.”
“I’m sure if you asked (Slovenia’s Anze) Kopitar and (Norway’s Mats) Zuccarello, they would say, ‘Absolutely, I wish to be involved and compete.’ But ultimately, those decisions are not mine to make.”
For many, it will be challenging to regard this as a true best-on-best competition, especially with key players like Kucherov, Kaprizov, Panarin, and Ovechkin absent.
“I understand the intention to promote the game, and the impact of the ongoing war makes it complex. Still, if we’re talking about a best-on-best tournament, Russia must be included,” remarked one player from Switzerland. “Fans would eagerly anticipate matches like Canada-Russia or U.S.-Russia. There’s always a certain magic when they compete.”
Another athlete from a smaller nation expressed disappointment: “It’s frustrating. There’s ample time to craft a tournament for four teams. Why can’t there be one for eight nations? They committed to the Olympics, so we can consider that a slight win, but it’s still tough to take.”
A Slovakian player noted, “You want to represent your nation. Consider that Czech Republic just won the World Championship this summer, yet they won’t participate.”
One Czech player suggested that the league should have established a unified Czechoslovakia team, while a German player longed for a Team Europe reminiscent of the 2016 World Cup of Hockey.
A Swiss player lightheartedly remarked that he plans to watch from “probably a beach somewhere.”
One takeaway from this situation is that NHL players thoroughly enjoyed their time in Arizona.
Who could blame them?
The sunny weather serves as an ideal rejuvenator during the season.
“I don’t know many players who disliked going to Arizona,” one player stated. “While fan attendance isn’t always high, a friend of mine who played there loved the lifestyle and overall environment. It’s a great place, but of course, it must also be worthwhile.”
“Arizona simply needs better ownership,” another player commented.
The same sentiment applies to Atlanta. This has led the NHL to consider a comeback to a northern suburb near the Braves’ stadium. However, enthusiasm for returning to a market that has previously hosted NHL teams seems muted, perhaps because many current players are too young to have experienced playing there.
GO DEEPER
Why an Atlanta NHL team could succeed if given a third chance
“Atlanta has had two attempts at an NHL team, both of which ended unsuccessfully. I have affection for Arizona, but the situation there hasn’t improved, and sadly, I doubt a new stadium will change that,” remarked one player.
There are those who believe that the league should not return to either city. Here are thoughts from four players:
“There are numerous other cities that would love to have an NHL team.”
“There’s a reason it didn’t work out in the past, so perhaps it’s time to try something different.”
“Let’s look into other markets in the U.S. or Canada.”
“It seems counterproductive to revisit a city you just left.”
Clayton Keller, who has spent all eight of his NHL seasons in Arizona before the team’s move to Utah, is optimistic about the market getting another opportunity.
“It would be tough not to bring a team back there,” he stated, fully aware that his comments would be attributed. “The fanbase is fantastic, and there are many individuals linked with the organization: Shane Doan, Ray Whitney, along with numerous others who are still active in the local hockey community. Many former players and their families continue to live in the area. It would indeed be incredible if they could return one day.”
If the NHL were to expand into Europe, London and Prague would likely be the top contenders.
“For practicality, London is the best option, as it’s only a four- or five-hour flight,” shared a player from a northeast team. “That’s closer than some NHL locations. The only drawback would be dealing with the time difference, but it’s still a shorter flight than heading to L.A.”
<p“Years ago, we played in Prague, and the atmosphere was fantastic,” said another player, who hails from outside Czechia. “You need to stick with locations that have shown to be successful.”
“Anyone would jump at the chance to play in Prague,” remarked a player from Czechia.
On a different note, what are the thoughts on Hawaii? While it might slightly bend the question’s criteria, since it’s a “state” rather than a “city/country” and located outside the continental U.S., players can’t be blamed for thinking outside the box. Should there be a move into Hawaii, a rivalry will undoubtedly arise among The Athletic NHL writers vying for the scoop.
Most players do not see the necessity for the league to penalize regroups that occur beyond the red line during overtime, even if the trend of skating or passing the puck outside the zone to reset or execute line changes has started to bore viewers.
Nonetheless, players acknowledged the reasoning behind the concern.
“I have to admit, it has become a bit more mundane than it used to be, primarily because teams are now better prepared,” one player commented. “Implementing a red-line rule would make things more exciting.”
It’s frustrating for players to skate for four minutes without the puck. They keep removing it. For the fans, it’s not enjoyable, and it’s not much fun for the players either.”
“Let’s see some fast-paced hockey,” another player suggested. “That’s the purpose of three-on-three play—there’s always action.”
A third player added, “It would certainly enhance the excitement. I believe there would be more goals, and it would make the games quicker, ending them faster than shootouts.”
One European player commented that he doesn’t believe a change is necessary in the NHL, but noted that “in the Swedish League, the situation is more critical. The larger ice surface presents more risks.”
However, the majority of players believe the league should leave the issue alone.
“There are plenty of goals scored in three-on-three, so I’m not sure we need to impose changes like that,” one player mentioned. “If they extended it to ten minutes, that might resolve the issue because I know goalies aren’t fond of shootouts. But I’m fine with things as they currently are.”
Another player remarked, “It’s not as if we’re just waiting behind the net. We build speed, and then another offensive play occurs. It remains quite entertaining.”
Moreover, if the league did adjust the rule, another player observed, “there will likely be other new elements introduced to create resets.”
A player proposed a compromise: “The red line seems strict. They should make it so that you can’t retreat into your own zone. That could help since I agree that resets have become excessive. But the red line appears acceptable. It’s the passing back to the goalie or skating back into our zone that is bothersome.”
Speaking of goalies, one humorously complained that his only issue with three-on-three is the way stats are tracked: “If goalies concede a goal, it shouldn’t affect their stats. In three-on-three, you might face only one or two shots. You can end a 60-minute game with over a 90 save percentage, but in a minute-and-a-half, allowing a goal drops you to 88.”
The majority of players polled feel that the NHL should adopt practices from other North American and European professional sports leagues by allowing officials to explain calls to the media when necessary.
“Absolutely,” one player affirmed, eliciting laughter. “Please.”
Nevertheless, it was clear that NHL players hold a great deal of respect for referees and linesmen. Many prefaced their comments by acknowledging the difficulty of the officials’ role.
“Mistakes will happen,” one player noted. “As players, we make errors too, but when a ref makes one, it tends to be more visible. It’s a challenging job for them. They’re doing their best.”
<p“Refs are human as well,” said another player. “I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. They receive no accolades and only hear complaints. However, I think it would be beneficial if they could explain their decisions, allowing fans to understand the reasoning behind certain calls. Perhaps this would lead to less unwarranted criticism.”
While some players acknowledged that the referees’ jobs are “already challenging enough,” others believed it is unfair that reporters must ask coaches and players to clarify referee decisions instead of the referees providing the explanations themselves.
“There are so many scenarios that are difficult to explain…”
“`html
“They need to articulate their decisions,” remarked one player.
Another joked, “We must talk to reporters, so why shouldn’t they?”
A third player added, “Pose three or four questions. I believe it would significantly impact their officiating since they would be aware that they need to respond after games.”
Nonetheless, this situation is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Daly stated that on-ice officials will remain inaccessible to reporters; however, he added, “If there is a need for a comment, it should come from the league. While there should be accountability, I believe it ultimately lies at the league level.”
This was a contest between two leading candidates that resulted in a tie, featuring future first-ballot Hall of Famers.
Clearly, both Sidney Crosby and Connor McDavid are recognized as the elite of the NHL, not only by the fans but also by their peers.
This duo has combined to earn seven Ted Lindsay trophies.
<p“They’re two generational talents,” stated one player. “It’d be fascinating to observe their leadership styles.”
One player who selected the reigning Stanley Cup champion captain, Aleksander Barkov, and endorsed his candidacy?
Nashville Predators goaltender Juuse Saros: “I’ve played alongside Barkov since I was 10, so it’d be great to team up with him.”
Once again, it was a narrow contest between the coaching Floridians, Jon Cooper and Paul Maurice.
Regarding Cooper, one player stated, “He simply knows how to win… every year.”
Maurice emerged as a popular choice due to his humor.
GO DEEPER
How Paul Maurice fuels Florida Panthers with profanity, humor and eloquence
“He seems to be a pretty cool coach based on his interviews and comments,” one player noted.
“I love his quotes,” another chimed in.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width
The most amusing reply here?
“This might seem unusual, but Torts,” remarked a defenseman from the Western Conference. “I would love to give Torts a try.”
(Graphic: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic, featuring images of Jon Cooper, Connor McDavid, and Sidney Crosby: Len Redkoles, Andy Devlin, and Joe Sargent / Getty Images)
Inside the NHL: Players Weigh In on Income Tax Advantages, Team Locations, and Leadership Ahead of the New Season
The Impact of Income Tax on NHL Players
Income tax plays a significant role in the financial decisions of NHL players. The league is well known for its high salaries, but the actual take-home pay can vary significantly depending on the team’s location and the state or province’s tax laws. Players often weigh these factors when signing contracts, and their insights can shed light on how income tax influences their choices.
Understanding Tax Differences Across NHL Teams
Different NHL franchises are located in regions with varying tax structures. For instance, teams based in states with no income tax, such as Florida, Texas, and Tennessee, can offer players a financial advantage. Conversely, teams in provinces like Ontario and Quebec impose higher income taxes, which can impact a player’s net earnings.
| Team Location | Income Tax Rate | Net Earnings Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Florida Panthers | 0% | Higher net earnings |
| New York Rangers | 10.9% | Lower net earnings |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 13.16% | Significantly lower net earnings |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 4.95% | Moderately lower net earnings |
Team Locations: More Than Just Geography
When considering a team, players often look beyond just the paycheck. The location of the team can greatly influence a player’s lifestyle and overall happiness, which in turn affects their performance on the ice. Factors such as cost of living, weather, and community support can significantly impact a player’s decision.
Cost of Living: A Major Consideration
The cost of living varies widely across North America, which can substantially affect a player’s financial situation. A higher salary in a city with a high cost of living may not provide as much financial relief as a slightly lower salary in a more affordable location. Here are key components:
- Housing: Prices can vary significantly; players need to factor in how much they will spend on housing.
- Transportation: Larger cities may have more public transport options, but costs for car ownership can be higher.
- Food and Entertainment: Players often enjoy dining out and socializing, which can impact their budgets.
Weather and Lifestyle Preferences
Weather can be a crucial factor for NHL players. Some thrive in snowy regions where they can enjoy winter sports during the off-season, while others prefer sunny climates. Consider these aspects:
- Winter Sports Opportunities: Regions with snow offer extensive training options in the off-season.
- Year-round Activities: Warmer climates provide outdoor activities, which can be appealing for a player’s family.
The Role of Leadership in the NHL
Leadership is paramount in the NHL, influencing both team dynamics and individual player performance. Effective leadership can motivate players, foster teamwork, and enhance overall morale.
Players’ Perspectives on Leadership Styles
Different players value various leadership styles, and their preferences can steer their choices about which teams to join. Here are some insights:
- Communicative Leaders: Many players appreciate captains who maintain open lines of communication and encourage discussion.
- Leading by Example: Players often look up to captains who demonstrate work ethic and commitment, setting a standard for the entire team.
- Resilient Leaders: In challenging situations, resilient leaders can inspire their teammates to overcome adversity.
Case Studies: Players’ Experiences with Tax and Leadership
Case Study 1: A High-Profile Move to Florida
Consider a player who recently signed with the Florida Panthers. This player cited the absence of state income tax as a significant factor in their decision. They commented:
“Moving to Florida not only means no state income tax but also a lifestyle that fits my family’s needs. The weather is a huge bonus!”
Case Study 2: The Pressure of High Tax States
Another player who decided to leave a team in California shared their experience of dealing with high taxes. They noted:
“Playing in California was great, but the taxes were a real hit to my paycheck. I wanted to make smart financial choices for my family.”
Benefits of Choosing Teams with Favorable Tax Structures
Choosing a team located in a tax-friendly area offers several benefits:
- Increased Earnings: The net salary can increase significantly, allowing for better investments and savings.
- Flexibility in Lifestyle Choices: More disposable income enables players to invest in experiences outside of hockey.
- Financial Security: Long-term contracts in favorable locations can provide peace of mind for players and their families.
Practical Tips for NHL Players Navigating Income Tax and Team Choices
NHL players can benefit from practical tips as they navigate contracts and team choices:
- Consult a Financial Advisor: Players should seek professional advice to understand the financial implications of their contracts.
- Research Team Locations: Understanding the local cost of living and tax rates can aid in making informed decisions.
- Evaluate Team Culture: Analyzing the team’s culture and leadership style is crucial for personal and professional satisfaction.
Firsthand Experience: Veteran Players Share Their Insights
Veteran players often have invaluable insights regarding income tax and location. Here are a few quotes from experienced players:
“I always considered taxes in my decisions. A little extra in my paycheck made a significant difference in my quality of life.” – A seasoned defenseman.
“Leadership can make or break a team. I’ve played for teams where the captain was a true leader, and it transformed our performance.” – An NHL forward.
Final Thoughts on NHL Players’ Considerations
NHL players face a complex landscape when making decisions about contracts and team locations. Income tax advantages, team culture, and leadership styles significantly shape their experiences and financial well-being. As the new season approaches, understanding these factors will be crucial for players aiming to maximize their careers both on and off the ice.
