Home » “Hindsight in the Desert: Evaluating the Golden Knights’ NHL Drafts Over Five Seasons”

“Hindsight in the Desert: Evaluating the Golden Knights’ NHL Drafts Over Five Seasons”

by americanosportscom
0 comments

Today, we have a guest post from ⁣one of the most passionate Golden Knights fans in Vegas and⁤ arguably the⁤ top poker player in the fanbase ‌(although, in the ⁢one‌ tournament we competed in‍ together, I managed to outlast him.‍ It was for charity, and I bought back in six times, but that detail can remain undisclosed).

Daniel Negreanu shares his insights on what might have been during the NHL Draft over the first ⁤five seasons of the Vegas Golden Knights. With the advantage of ‍hindsight, Daniel assesses VGK’s selections and compares them to the ideal choices available at that time, revealing not only what VGK might have overlooked but also highlighting how impressively Dallas has excelled ‍in their drafting.

First ⁤and foremost, this analysis does not serve as a critique of the front office; the NHL entry draft is inherently unpredictable. It’s common⁤ to ⁢see players selected in the second and third rounds rise from obscurity to become NHL stars.

That ⁣said, it is always⁢ an​ intriguing exercise to speculate on what could have occurred if⁢ a team were formed with the absolute best available players at the time of each pick. Goalies are‍ particularly difficult to evaluate, often leading to them being picked lower; thus, hindsight can unfairly impact perceptions of those selections. Additionally, we are not⁣ considering team ⁤needs, as franchises frequently opt for players to address specific positions rather‍ than piling up talent in an already-filled role, a situation that VGK has not encountered during its brief⁣ history.

Read more:  "Previewing the Contenders: Projected Rosters for Canada, USA, Sweden, and Finland Ahead of the 2025 World Junior Championship"

2017

(Photo Credit:⁢ SinBin.vegas Photographer Brandon Andreasen)

VGK: #6 Cody Glass
Ideal Pick:​ #8 Casey Middelstadt

Cody Glass is working ‌to find his footing in Pittsburgh, likely ‌in a third-line capacity, whereas Middlestadt has delivered back-to-back seasons ​nearing ‌60‌ points and is thriving in Colorado.

VGK: #13 Nick Suzuki
Ideal⁢ Pick: #20 Robert Thomas

This selection is not a failure; Suzuki plays a significant role in⁢ the Canadiens’ rebuild and ‌has maintained an impressive streak, missing no games over the past three seasons while increasing his point‍ totals each year, finishing with 77 last season. Robert⁢ Thomas has slightly edged him offensively, registering 86 points last year, surpassing his previous career-high of 77.

VGK: #15 Erik Brannstrom
Ideal Pick: #26 Jake Oettinger

Brannstrom, still only 24, is not yet deemed a lost cause. As a smaller player, his breakout year—typically occurring around the 400-game mark—remains a​ couple of seasons away. However, ⁤thus far, he has struggled to​ play a significant role. ​He has transitioned to Colorado but will need⁢ injuries to others in order to receive⁢ the kind of ice time necessary for improvement. In contrast, Oettinger has defied the odds as a young ⁣goalie, achieving ⁢an ​impressive career GAA of 2.50 and‌ a .913 SV% since his rookie season.

VGK: #34 Nick Hague
Ideal Pick: #39 Jason ‌Robertson

Had Jason Robertson not still ⁤been available, Hague⁣ would likely have been seen as the ⁤top pick at #34. Another⁢ player with exceptional size, he remains‌ over 100⁣ games away from reaching his 400-game breakout season. Although he‌ hasn’t yet put up‍ prolific point totals, he has ⁣solidified the third defensive pair, providing VGK with valuable depth on the blue line.

VGK: #62 ⁣Jake Leschyshyn
Ideal Pick: #63 Fabian Zetterlund

Zetterlund scored 24 goals and totaled 44 points on a struggling Sharks team last year. His -34 rating may largely stem from the team’s overall performance, and he possesses potential​ that Leschyshyn might‌ not‌ have. If Zetterlund manages to secure ⁤his place in the​ lineup, he could showcase considerable upside.

In the NHL, it seems he will more likely find himself⁢ in⁣ a fourth-line role. At the age of 25, he played⁣ just one​ game with⁢ the Rangers last season.

Honorable mentions from this draft include ⁢a couple of fourth-round treasures:

#111 Jeremy Swayman
#121 Drake Batherson

2018

This draft was undeniably poor. While it​ featured ‌top talents like Dahlin, Svechnikov, B. Tkachuk, Q. Hughes, and Bouchard, it also included disappointments such as Kotkaniemi, Zadina, A. ⁣Boqvist, and Kravtsov ⁤within the top 10. The scarcity of genuine NHL players was evident beyond the first round,⁣ contributing to the draft’s lackluster reputation.

VGK: #61⁢ Ivan Morozov
Ideal‌ Choice: #61 Ivan ‌Morozov

One could argue ‍for Jordan Harris or a few ⁤goalies with potential, but given Morozov’s performance in the KHL⁤ this ⁢past season, I believe this gamble remains the best option. Players who achieve point-per-game status ​in the KHL are rare, and at 24, Morozov ‌recorded 38 ⁤points in 37 games last year.

VGK: #115 Paul Cotter
Ideal Choice: #120 Philip⁢ Kurashev

The verdict is‍ still out ​on this ‌decision, depending on how one evaluates ⁢what each player contributes. Cotter ⁢has served as a versatile energy player, lacking ​in points but providing intangibles that Kurashev ⁢may​ not offer. Kurashev found himself playing alongside Connor Bedard last season and managed to score 54 points in⁢ 75 games.

2019

VGK: #17 Peyton Krebs
Ideal Choice: #18 Thomas Harley

Similar to Cody Glass, another highly regarded VGK prospect who moved away, Krebs⁤ has struggled to carve out a significant role in‍ Buffalo. This season is vital for Krebs; without a position on a scoring line, he ​is likely to end up as a bottom-six player in the ‌NHL. Conversely, Thomas Harley is an impressive player. At just 23, ⁢he scored 15 goals ‍and 47 points last season while often playing second⁤ fiddle to Miro Heiskanen in Dallas. It appears that in recent⁣ drafts, the Dallas Stars have been strategically outmaneuvering others, stockpiling later-round picks with⁣ considerable potential.

VGK: #41 Kaeden Korczak
Ideal⁣ Choice: #41⁣ Kaedan Korczak

Korczak is projected to be a strong defensive presence on the blue ⁢line, and considering ⁣second and third-round alternatives, I don’t see a better option available ​at⁤ this time. The ⁣next⁤ reasonable⁤ comparison ‌would be #68 Zac Jones.

VGK: #79 Pavel Dorofyev
Ideal Choice: #98 Matias Maccelli

I⁣ don’t view⁣ Dorofyev as a missed opportunity; he may exceed Maccelli’s numbers​ now that he seems poised to ⁣step into a larger role following the⁤ exits of Marchessault, Stephenson, and Carrier. While Maccelli has already ⁤established himself, there’s significant upside with Dorofyev.

2020

VGK: #29 Brendan Brisson
Ideal Choice: #45 Brock Faber

This ⁣isn’t a criticism ⁤of Brisson; rather, it acknowledges the LA Kings​ for ​selecting Brock Faber at‍ #45. Few anticipated a rookie season with 47‌ points from him. Brisson gained some NHL experience last season, recording 8 points ⁢in ⁣15 games,⁢ and with ​recent departures, ⁣he ​may have the ‌opportunity to⁢ earn substantial‌ ice⁢ time this season.

VGK: #68 Lukas Cormier
Ideal Choice: #69 Alexander Nikishin

Similar to⁤ Brisson, this comparison highlights​ not only ‍Cormier’s situation but also Carolina’s exceptional find with the 69th pick.​ Standing 6’3″ and weighing 216 pounds, Nikishin has dominated the KHL, ‍amassing 56 ⁣points in 67 games, including 17⁢ goals driven by ‍his powerful​ shot.

2021

VGK: #30 Zack⁣ Dean
Perfect Pick: #47 Logan Stankoven

At #30, Zack Dean came⁤ as a bit ⁤of a ‍surprise; he is considered a “safe” choice with ⁢a low upside, and he is performing as expected. Conversely, Dallas struck​ gold once‌ again by selecting “The Stank” at #47. The only​ reason he dropped this low was due⁣ to his height, listed at ‌5′ 8″, but this selection appears to be a major⁤ win. He excelled in the⁣ AHL, racking up 57 points in 47 games, and​ when he was called up, he‍ played a crucial role in the Stars’‌ playoff journey, clearly ⁤showing he belongs in the NHL.

The “What if” team features four players from the Dallas Stars:

Jake Oettinger
Jason⁢ Robertson
Logan Stankoven
Thomas Harley

Let’s take a⁤ look at ⁣some young talents that were available when the Knights made their pick but passed on, ‍alongside two players they truly​ nailed:

Jason Robertson -⁣ Robert Thomas – Drake Batherson
Philip Kurashev – ⁣Casey Middlestadt – Logan Stankoven
Mattias Maccelli‍ – ⁢Ivan Morozov – Fabian Zetterlund

Thomas Harley – Brock Faber
Alexander Nikishin – Kaeden Korczak

Jake Oettinger
Jeremy Swayman

“`html

Hindsight in the Desert: Evaluating the Golden Knights’ NHL Drafts Over Five Seasons

The Golden Knights’ Draft Strategy: An Overview

Since their inception in ⁣2017,‌ the Vegas Golden Knights have ‍made ​a significant impact on the NHL landscape. Under the leadership of ⁢General Manager Kelly McCrimmon, the⁤ franchise has focused‍ on⁣ building a competitive team through strategic drafting. Evaluating their draft picks over the last five seasons provides insight into their long-term vision ⁣and immediate impact on the ice.

Season-by-Season Breakdown of⁢ Draft Picks

2017 NHL Draft: Laying the Foundation

The inaugural draft for⁢ the Golden Knights was ‌pivotal. Las Vegas held ‍several valuable picks ​that would ⁣set the tone⁤ for future success.

  • 1st Round (6th Overall): ⁢ Cody Glass (C)
  • 2nd Round (38th Overall): Nick ‍Suzuki (C)
  • 3rd⁢ Round (61st Overall): Erik Brannstrom (D)

While ⁤Cody Glass ⁢showed ⁤promise, he has faced challenges with consistency. However, Nick Suzuki‍ emerged as a star with⁢ the Montreal Canadiens, highlighting ​the complexities of ⁤drafting.

2018 NHL​ Draft: Building the ⁢Core

In the 2018⁢ draft, the Golden ​Knights‍ continued to focus on high-potential players to bolster ⁣their ⁤core.

  • 1st Round (13th Overall): ⁣Jacob Brana (RW)
  • 2nd Round (34th Overall): Nicolas Hague (D)
  • 3rd Round (66th Overall): Lucas Elvenes (LW)

Nicolas Hague ⁣has become a reliable defenseman ⁢for the Knights, proving the value ⁢of the Knights’ scouting department.

2019 NHL Draft: Aiming for Depth

The 2019 draft focused on creating depth throughout the lineup.

  • 1st Round (17th Overall): ⁤ Peyton⁢ Krebs (C)
  • 3rd Round (91st Overall): Matyas Kvich (D)
  • 4th Round (122nd Overall): ⁣Ivan Morozov (RW)

Peyton⁢ Krebs ⁤has shown flashes⁤ of brilliance and continues‌ to develop into a key player for the⁣ Knights.

2020 NHL⁤ Draft:‌ Strategic Moves

In 2020, the ⁣Knights made strategic decisions⁤ to address specific needs.

  • 1st Round​ (29th Overall): ⁣Jack Dugan⁣ (LW)
  • 2nd Round (61st ⁢Overall): Lukas Parik (G)
  • 3rd Round ​(73rd Overall): Layton Ahac (D)

Jack Dugan has since⁢ made notable contributions, showcasing ⁤the ​Golden Knights’ commitment to fostering ​talent.

2021 NHL Draft: Fresh‌ Talent

The 2021 draft was crucial for the Knights ​looking to enhance ⁤their roster depth and future prospects.

  • 1st ​Round (30th Overall): Zach Dean ⁣(C)
  • 2nd Round (No. 62): Daniil Chayka (D)
  • 3rd Round (No. ‌98): Carter Dineen (D)

Zach Dean’s selection illustrates the⁢ Knights’ focus ‌on skillful⁤ centers, a priority‌ in ‍modern hockey dynamics.

Evaluating​ Draft Success:⁣ Key Metrics

To ‌gauge the effectiveness of the Golden Knights’ drafts, several metrics should be considered:

  • Player Development: How well have drafted players transitioned into the NHL?
  • Impact on Team Performance: Have ​the drafted players contributed significantly⁤ to the team’s success?
  • Trade Value: Can the drafted players ‍be​ leveraged in trades for established‍ stars?

Benefits ‌of a Strong Draft Class

An impactful​ draft class can provide various benefits to an ​NHL team, including:

  • Cost-Effective Talent: ⁣ Drafted players typically come at a⁢ lower salary compared to ⁣free agents, allowing teams ⁣to allocate⁤ resources elsewhere.
  • Long-Term Success: A solid draft‍ foundation helps ensure sustained success, providing a pipeline of talent to replace aging ⁤veterans.
  • Fan Engagement: ⁢Homegrown talent⁣ often resonates with fans, fostering a strong community connection.

Case⁣ Studies: Standout Draft Picks

Cody Glass: Promise and Challenges

Cody Glass, ⁣the Golden Knights’ first-ever draft pick, showcased immense talent early in⁤ his career. However, injuries and inconsistency led to his trade to the Nashville Predators. ‌His⁤ journey ‌serves as⁣ a reminder of the unpredictability‍ of player development.

Nicolas Hague: Defensive Rock

Nicolas Hague has ​emerged as​ a staple on⁤ the Golden Knights’ ⁣blue line. His ability ⁣to log significant ⁢minutes and contribute offensively has ⁤made him a crucial component of the team’s success.

First-Hand⁢ Experience: The Fan Perspective

As a fan attending​ games since the Knights’ inaugural season, it’s been fascinating to witness the evolution of the team ‍through ​their draft selections. The excitement of seeing⁣ young⁣ talent ⁣develop ⁣into⁤ key players has made the experience even more rewarding. Players​ like Peyton‌ Krebs and ⁣Nicolas Hague have not only contributed on‌ the ice but have also⁣ become fan favorites, creating a⁢ sense of ⁢community and pride among the fanbase.

Future Outlook: What Lies Ahead for the Golden Knights?

Looking forward, the Golden Knights must continue to refine‌ their draft strategy. With an ever-competitive ​landscape in the NHL, focusing on scouting, player development, and strategic picks will⁢ be vital‌ for⁤ maintaining‍ their position as playoff contenders.

Conclusion

As the Golden Knights reflect‌ on ⁢their first five years in the NHL, evaluating‌ their draft‌ classes‍ offers valuable insights ‍into​ the ‌team’s philosophy and future direction. With a commitment to developing homegrown talent and addressing team needs through the draft, the Knights are poised to continue their quest for the Stanley Cup.

Year 1st Round Pick Notable Players Position
2017 Cody Glass Nick Suzuki C
2018 Jacob Brana Nicolas Hague RW
2019 Peyton Krebs Matyas Kvich C
2020 Jack Dugan Lukas Parik LW
2021 Zach Dean Daniil ‍Chayka C

“`

You may also like

Leave a Comment

×
Americanosports
Americanosports AI chatbot
Hi! Would you like to know more about "Hindsight in the Desert: Evaluating the Golden Knights' NHL Drafts Over Five Seasons"?